Recently, the news had opted to focus all of its attention on a little country that means even less: North Korea. Such a relic! Its military is from the 1970s and its ideology from the 1950s, but its shame is definitely still present. Despite there being not a single shred of evidence that North Korea can A) hit the United States with a nuclear bomb; B) successfully mount a military campaign to invade Candyland or C) feed its own people, everyone outside of South Korea was worried about North Korea.
Well, I’m glad that the American government felt that Secretary of State John Kerry needed to come out and personally apply pressure on China/appear with Pak Geun-Hye to resolve this situation. I’m sure some backroom deal was brokered to pacify everything. What I’m really confused about is why the American media feels the need to over-sensationalize every— wait. Wait. Never mind. I just answered my own stupid question. If anyone wanted to think about the situation calmly and rationally it would go something like this:
“Well, North Korea is making threats and using a lot of confrontational rhetoric. What does this mean?”
“Hmm. Let me think. It is a country that has recently just been sanctioned by the U.N. This is relevant for two reasons: 1) China, perhaps N. Korea’s last significant ally and the regional hegemon, supported the sanctions and 2) North Korea is angry because it has even fewer resources to continue its existence.”
“Wow. I didn’t know that. Go on.”
“Of course, Courteous Counterpart. North Korea feels backed into a corner and is a little paranoid, so it reacting the same way a 5 year old child does when Daddy takes away rights to the cookie jar and Mommy actually agrees with Daddy instead of indulging the little fat bastard: a small tantrum. Now let me ask you a question – are you scared of a five year old throwing a tempter tantrum?”
“No. A five-year old is too weak to really hurt anyone.”
“Exactly. North Korea is the same. It is too weak to really decide to try and cross the world’s most heavily fortified border to face a military with a huge qualitative edge that is backed by the most powerful country in the world and probably 90% of the world in general. Even assuming a missile launch or some other form of action towards South Korea, North Korea would be finished within a week. Ergo, nothing will happen and North Korea is just trying to call attention to itself (and maybe Kim Jong-Eun is trying to cement his leadership, using any resulting aid-deals or concessions as victory points).”
(Short of going into a political science diatribe on what constitutes a state and what characteristics/behavior are common to all states, I’m going to stop this dialogue.)
Wow. Wasn’t that succinct? Do we really need to over sensationalize all of— ah crap! I did it again. I tried thinking logically when all the major news sources care about is getting somewhere between 10-70% of the information correct in direct inverse proportion to how quickly they can release it and increase viewership considering most Americans are stupid sensationalist-loving excuses of intellectual creations. Oh, that brings me to another, more recent and more tragic event.
Boston holds a very special place in my life. I am a dyed-in-the-womb die-hard Red Sox fan. I have more Bosox clothing/Boston clothing than anything else in my wardrobe (I just checked). I love the feel of the city, the way it’s laid out (much better than NY), the architecture, the history, and so many other things about it. I love that Boston is an intellectual city (MIT, Harvard, BU, BC, Berklee, Emerson, etc.) and a blue-collar salty city. Boston is New England’s city. The Beacon on a Hill. The Home of the Fens… It’s not the financial center like NY, it’s not the political center, like D.C., it’s kind of a lower-Ivy of American cities – storied history and full of great accomplishments, but it’s not a giant. That’s partly why I was so shocked when I awoke the other day, opened my news and saw “Breaking News: Boston Marathon explosions…” Explosions that have left 3 dead and over 150 wounded.
As much as I cannot understand why whoever perpetrated this act chose Boston, the Marathon, or even chose to do this in general, I also cannot understand two other related aspects – the news coverage and the American reaction. For my feelings on the news coverage, see the above Korean discussion about over-sensationalizing news for intellectually deficient Americans. Before I continue, I want to offer a little parallel. 1 year and 11 months ago I was in another conflict-lodestone of our world – Jerusalem. I was studying abroad in Israel after being evacuated from Cairo and the Egyptian chapter of the Arab Spring and had agreed to join my friend in running the 1st official Jerusalem Marathon. Two days before the marathon, some unidentified individuals (Hamas claimed responsibility and two individuals of another militant group are currently awaiting trial for their involvement) placed a bomb at a bus stop – killing one woman and wounding 39 more. There was speculation that this was a precursor of an even larger effort to be made at the marathon. I very much remember the fear at that time. I remember how, even in such an ever-stressed and contested state, there was that little edge of nervousness. An uncertainty as to whether or not something worse would happen. However, that nervousness was mitigated by the underlying belief that life must be enjoyed to its fullest – don’t let somebody else’s maybe prevent you from achieving your definite happiness. A lot of people from home and from Haifa University told the group of us going down to run in Jerusalem that we should stay home because it could be too dangerous. Most of us replied with “Why?” I distinctly recall feeling that you have to keep experiencing life. If you let others dictate how you are going to live and make your choices for you, then you aren’t living your life any more. Someone else is. Reflecting on that sentiment now, I begin to get a little more curious: what course of action did the Tsarnaev brothers (if they are the perpetrators) intend to force American lives into? What are they crying out for? What change are they hoping to affect? Who is trying to change how people live – were they by themselves or part of a group or is it all a conspiracy? I’m not asking these questions so that we can get the quick answer that sets everything neatly into our black and white worlds and we can go target the “individuals responsible.”As you can see, my first thoughts aren’t what you typically see on the news or on your facebook feed. That brings me to my point about the American reaction. I was astounded by the number of posts I saw – both on news feeds and social media sites – that were some derivative of “DON’T F&^* WITH BOSTON!!! WE ARE GOING TO F***ING KILL YOUUUUUU!” or “AMERICA! GOD BLESS US!!!! F*** YOU YOU F**** SDI(R$Y*G REW*G(*GF # *)G WE’RE GOING TO KILL YOUUUUUU!” So many people beat their breasts and thumped their feet to the tune of violence and anger that I was reminded of a five year old with a hammer (see the similarity to the N. Korea story we talked about earlier?). You are angry and you think the best thing to do is swing your hammer about because you want to crush the thing that makes you angry. Let me tell you a little allegorical scenario: A little boy is playing with some dogs and puppies in a room. The boy is clearly not too smart, a little obese, and his mommy does whatever she can to make him happy or else he gets angry and swings his hammer (see where this is going yet?). The boy believes that play time involves pinching, biting, pulling, and otherwise hurting the dogs and puppies. But again, this little boy is too stupid to recognize that he may be a little too rough. Eventually, one of the dogs bites the boy because it was hurt too many times. The boy swings his hammer and cripples the dog. He goes back to playing. Another dog bites the boy after he hurt it too much. The boy swings his hammer and kills a different dog by accident. The boy goes back to playing and the cycle repeats. Not once during his play time does the boy ever wonder why the dogs are biting him, he just responds by swinging his hammer and doing the same thing. Do you get the moral of the story?
For some context: There are very, very, very few times you should ever wish someone dead. There are very, very, very few times you should voice that thought out loud. In my opinion, you should never ever combine the desire to wish someone dead with blind anger and nationalism. That is an incredibly heady brew, intoxicating in its consumption, that can actually create a critical mass if joined with other like-minded individuals or groups. The readiness with which so many people sprang to display their callous hate, nationalist righteous anger, and a desire for violence to the world is sickening. It was revolting to witness. I was disgusted, disappointed, and a little ashamed that many people I grew up with, those I consider dear friends, and such a seemingly large portion of the country all felt that this was the appropriate reaction to this situation. Maybe it is because my first reaction is to ask questions and get more information. Not call for blood. Maybe this comes from my viewpoint while outside America, as it was in May 2011 when I saw the same thing while in Israel regarding Osama Bin Laden’s death. Maybe I’m disgusted because I know that whatever caused the individuals to go to such lengths that they bombed a finish line at a marathon is not going to end with their deaths. Maybe it is because I would rather search for a way so that this will not happen again from any other person, rather than being so short-sighted as to only think of the here and now. Or maybe I am wrong/too idealistic.
In other news, my fantasy baseball team is not doing well, my real Red Sox team is, and I’m glad that most of my friends that I’ve gotten updates from are all safe, sound, and striving to achieve their dreams. Keep a steady hand on the tiller and sail for that horizon.